Draft of Software Architecture Document (SAD)
Needs team review and input.
#1 Updated by email@example.com over 8 years ago
- Due date set to 02/22/2012
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- Assignee set to firstname.lastname@example.org
- Estimated time set to 0.50 h
Based on Stuart's feedback I changed my itemization of process report areas to just a general process component data section. It may help to clean up your diagrams to change the wording to process component. Also, I chucked my diagram from the SRS since it seemed to confuse and mislead Andy and Stuart rather than help to define requirements. In its place I added a process definition to the appendix of the SRS which helps to define exactly what would be expected from a process report document.
Also, I didn't have a reader role in the requirements. Do you think this is a necessary role?
I think your performance timing seems very different from the SRS. I had 10 seconds for page load and 30 seconds for update; Andy thought this was too conservative, so I changed it to Andy's suggested time which I think was 5 seconds to load and 10 seconds for update.
Overall, I think it is a good starting point for the architecture document, but it feels like it veers a bit from the SPMP and SRS.
#2 Updated by Anonymous over 8 years ago
- File SAD_DTCPII_andy.doc SAD_DTCPII_andy.doc added
- Status changed from Resolved to In Progress
- Assignee changed from email@example.com to firstname.lastname@example.org
Review comments attached.
Good first draft, but lots to talk about at our next meeting. I think we will need one more team iteration before submitting to Stuart for review.